Joshua Templeman- seemingly an absolute Chad!
This post is about the one fateful day, I saw an advert for a RomCom on a YouTube video and on this rare occasion- I immediately switched to the movie and saved the video for later. I won’t lie, my first impulse to watch the movie was Austin Stowell’s face, I am also not sorry that I watched The Hating Game! Now that I have read the book on which the movie is based- I understand a lot of things that I thought remained unexplained/ out of place in the movie. Yes, I ended up liking the story of the movie that much! To be honest I am like this with different things that I like about a movie, cartoon, video game, author, actor… you name it!
Now, I will try my best to give out spoilers, but I guess it
will fail at that anyway. So, consider this as a Spoiler alert warning for this
post. On with it now… The movie or the book by itself are no Shakespearean
piece, I like it for the ease with which it delves in the insecurities of both parties
involved. Though most people may call it too direct- I think sometimes you need
something just like that to make it relatable. The plot of the movie is fairly
simple- it’s a romance, a classic office romance. Apt timing, I guess,
considering a lot of people will now start heading back to offices for the first
time after the pandemic. π
To say I really like something enough to read the book soon
after I watch the movie has only happened in case of the likes of, The Theory
of Everything or The Godfather. So safe to say this was an anomaly I had to
psycho- analyse. Here are the reasons I have managed to come up with to explain
the instant and intense liking I took to this movie. For the first time in a
long time did I find something that felt close to the real world. This movie
could actually happen (not as dramatically if I may add!) in an office setting.
However, what also makes this story special is that is explains the man’s backstory
as much as it does the woman. Usually, men are portrayed as strong, stoic and
mysterious, with little explanation of what leads them to that state. Although the
book and the movie have a lot of sequential changes and edits in the interest
of a movie adaptation- I am glad that they still manage to explain Josh’s (Joshua
Templeman) backstory along with Lucy’s (Lucinda Hutton).
I find it extremely refreshing that for the first time in a
long time- a story addresses the issues of insecurities of someone who is
perceived as the perfect male specimen who has the world at his feet thanks to
his attractive exterior (refer to the scene in the movie where Danny talks
about him wondering how it must feel to be like Josh- who is probably
worshipped for his body). Its nice to see how this person who appears to have
it all, is but a hurt and shy little boy deep down. Joshua Templeman from
everyone’s perspective is a narcissistic hard ass, with no regard for anyone’s
feelings. Lucy often thinks him a control freak and you will find her calling
him a sociopath on occasion too! Now while this may resonate with the
personality of Christian Grey to some, you may be wondering what makes Josh so
special, right?!
The fact that there is no extreme incident or physically
abusive childhood or addict parents as was the case with Christian, is something
we need to consider. Josh is from one of what one would regard as the most socially
acceptable and respected families. His parents are doctors and so is his older
brother, he is the odd one out (He has a Harvard MBA). He has a loving mother
who cares for him very much. His insecurities stem from beliefs of being an
accidental child and the son who disappointed his father from the very moment
he took his first breath in the world. How this leads him to become someone who
passively thrives for acceptance from anywhere he can find it and as a result works
relentlessly to be the best. It’s a classic case of how an offhand comment
followed by a complete rejection of any accomplishment of a child can give birth
to a demon that slowly makes home in one’s psyche. Not to mention how this
perception only develops into a self-sabotaging demon inside you with time. Although
he successfully feigns nonchalance it is very clear that deep down under that
tough exterior is a little boy craving acceptance and acknowledgement all his
life. I agree that this pathological drive made him the successful man that he is,
but we can’t disregard the fact that it also led to a life of solitude and bottled-up
torment. It is equal parts sad and interesting to see how he has been used as a
hunk of meat in the past by woman which led him to constantly doubting his
worth, not to mention the final nail in this coffin being his ex-girlfriend
ending up with his (from his perspective nice and perfect) brother. This
apparently all-round tough guy felt like he would for his whole life be loved
for nothing more than his external appearances ergo that would always remain
the sum total of who he is. Sure, Sally Thorne (the author) shows us Lucy’s self-conscious
beliefs about her small stature being a disadvantage and her internal struggle
with shaking her past off and accepting that she is just as good as the next
person raised in New York city as opposed to her upbringing on a farm in
Vermont.
I commend the fact that Sally manged to subtly address the
narrative of the alpha male dominance of protecting the damsel in distress to
that of mutual rescue of the hero and heroine while superbly explaining how
they navigate each other’s demons and scars. The balance of the dynamic is
wrapped so well in their petty competition and game of hate that it may be missed
in subtext altogether. Like at the paintball game- how Lucy jumps in to save in
Josh (as he is the flag bearer) and then seeing her being hurt Josh then
tackles her down to shield her with his body. Or when she breaks the typical
stereotype of the man standing up for the woman and protecting her- when Lucy
tells Arthur (Josh’s dad) off when he continues to demean Josh at his older
brother’s post wedding breakfast. Isn’t it lovely to see the tiny little Lucy
is alpha-Josh’s shining Dame in armour? π That mental image is positive delicious for
me. The story does show the typical male marking territory events between Danny
and Josh over Lucy. Also, the delicious love-hate back and forth between Lucy and
Joshua is a delight to savour. There is also a fair amount of the typical misunderstandings
between two people newly taking stock of their feelings for each other and the
grand gesture of sacrifice of all else for love my Josh at the end which is all
very wholesome to watch/ read.
Personally though, nothing will be more special for me than
the insight that we get into the intricacies of the result of psychological
damage leading to the development of insecurities in the day to day good
looking and successful man. The struggle for him to learn to express himself and
communicate it all through to Lucy and to explain his innermost feelings of
inadequacies. His intuitive understanding of Lucy’s insecurities and his innate
drive to make the object of his desire into a better version of herself. Last
but not the least his open acknowledgement of the fact that he considered her
excellent at her job and a worthy opponent and accept that she made him better
as a person and an employee. This story for me is about the contemporary Darcy
in some ways- as aptly hinted at by Helen in the movie version- with a better
explained backstory. If you have made it this far, I am flattered! And if you
haven’t already- do yourself a favour and watch this movie. Single or attached,
alone or with your significant other- I do believe this story has something to
offer to everyone.
Until next time peeps... π
Take care and be kind!
Comments
Post a Comment